The designation refers to a specific athlete on the Collingwood Football Club roster, identified by the numerical identifier assigned to their jersey. This numerical assignment serves as a common method for identifying players within a team context, facilitating communication and record-keeping related to their performance and participation.
The significance of a particular player wearing that number stems from their contributions to the team, which can range from on-field performance and leadership to community engagement and representation of the club’s values. Historically, certain individuals who have worn this jersey number may have achieved notable milestones or held a unique place in the team’s trajectory, adding symbolic weight to the number itself. Benefits of closely following players by their jersey number include ease of tracking player statistics, identifying them in game footage, and referencing them in analyses and discussions.
The ensuing article will delve into specific facets of this individuals career, including their playing history, statistical achievements, and any notable impact on the team and the broader Australian Football League landscape. The article also aims to contextualize their role within the team’s current strategies and future prospects.
1. Statistical Performance
Statistical performance serves as a crucial objective measure of a player’s contributions and effectiveness on the field. Analyzing key metrics provides insights into “Collingwood player 36’s” strengths, weaknesses, and overall impact on game outcomes.
-
Disposal Efficiency
Disposal efficiency quantifies the accuracy and effectiveness of a player’s ball handling. High disposal efficiency indicates that the player consistently makes effective passes, reducing turnovers and maximizing scoring opportunities. For “Collingwood player 36,” a strong disposal efficiency would suggest a reliable and skillful ball user, contributing to effective team possessions.
-
Contested Possessions
Contested possessions reflect a player’s ability to win the ball in physically challenging situations. A high number of contested possessions indicates a player’s strength, courage, and determination. Regarding “Collingwood player 36,” a strong contested possession rate could mark the player as a tough, reliable player that wins key possessions at crucial moments.
-
Marks Inside 50
Marks inside 50 are a critical measure of a forward player’s ability to secure scoring opportunities within the attacking zone. A significant number of marks inside 50 demonstrates strong positioning, aerial skills, and a threat to the opposition’s defense. For “Collingwood player 36” playing in a forward position, a high number of marks inside 50 indicates their effectiveness in creating scoring chances.
-
Tackles
The number of tackles completed reflects a player’s defensive pressure and commitment to winning the ball back for their team. A high tackle count indicates a player’s willingness to work hard defensively and disrupt the opposition’s ball movement. Regarding “Collingwood player 36,” this statistic could indicate their contribution to team defense and pressure around the ball.
Examining these statistical facets provides a comprehensive understanding of the player’s contributions beyond simple observations. By analyzing disposal efficiency, contested possessions, marks inside 50, and tackles, analysts and fans alike can gain a data-driven assessment of “Collingwood player 36s” role and impact within the team.
2. Team Role
An assigned number signifies more than mere identification; it often reflects a player’s designated position and specific responsibilities within the team structure. “Collingwood player 36’s” role directly influences team strategy, impacting both offensive and defensive plays. For example, if assigned to a key defensive position, the individual’s performance in intercepting passes and creating turnovers becomes paramount to the team’s overall defensive strength. Conversely, if positioned as a forward, their ability to convert scoring opportunities directly affects the team’s offensive output. The allocation of responsibilities is not arbitrary; it is determined by the player’s skill set, physical attributes, and tactical understanding of the game.
The effectiveness of any player, including “Collingwood player 36,” depends significantly on how well their assigned role integrates with the team’s broader strategic objectives. An exemplary midfielder, for instance, might possess exceptional ball-winning capabilities. However, their full potential is realized only when their efforts translate into effective transitions and scoring opportunities for the forward line. Likewise, a defender with outstanding intercept skills can significantly bolster the team’s defense, but their efforts must be complemented by coordinated pressure from the midfield to prevent opposition entries into the defensive zone. Historical examples within the Collingwood Football Club, or other AFL teams, reveal instances where individuals thrived when their skills aligned perfectly with their assigned roles, resulting in significant team success. Conversely, mismatches between player capabilities and team requirements have often resulted in diminished performance and strategic vulnerabilities.
Understanding “Collingwood player 36’s” team role is essential for a comprehensive evaluation of their overall contribution. It provides context for interpreting statistical data and assessing on-field performance. Furthermore, recognizing the strategic significance of a designated position allows for a deeper appreciation of the complexities involved in building a successful and cohesive team. The effectiveness of “Collingwood player 36,” like any player, is therefore inextricably linked to their ability to execute their assigned role and contribute to the team’s collective goals.
Collingwood Player 36
This exploration has examined the significance of a particular athlete identified as “Collingwood player 36” through the lens of statistical performance and designated team role. Quantifiable metrics, such as disposal efficiency, contested possessions, marks inside 50, and tackles, provide objective insights into on-field contributions. Simultaneously, understanding the assigned role within the team’s strategic framework contextualizes individual performance, highlighting the interdependencies between player actions and overall team objectives. The value of any athlete is thus determined by a confluence of individual skill and strategic alignment.
Further analysis could explore the historical trajectory of individuals who have previously held this designation, providing longitudinal comparisons and revealing potential trends in player performance and role evolution. A deeper understanding of the correlation between specific training regimes and statistical improvements may also provide valuable insights for future player development and team success. Continued scrutiny of these factors is essential for a comprehensive assessment of player contributions and the ongoing evolution of team dynamics.
